International Journal of Ayurveda360 (IJOA), as a reputable scientific journal committed to the advancement of Ayurveda and integrated medical sciences, adheres strictly to the highest standards of peer review integrity. Our Peer Review Policy is designed to ensure the fair, unbiased, and timely evaluation of submitted manuscripts, in accordance with the principles outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the Best Practice Guidelines.

Editorial Review

Upon submission, all manuscripts undergo rigorous editorial review by our experienced editorial staff. To expedite the process and uphold quality standards, manuscripts are initially assessed for their alignment with our editorial criteria. Those deemed to have significant potential and relevance are selected for further evaluation through double-blind peer review.

Peer Review Process

Selected manuscripts are subjected to double-blind peer review, wherein the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential throughout the evaluation process. Typically, two to three expert reviewers are assigned to assess each manuscript, ensuring a comprehensive and thorough evaluation. Additional reviewers may be consulted for specialized expertise or technical insights.

Decision Making

Based on the feedback provided by the reviewers, the editorial team makes a decision on the manuscript, considering various factors including novelty, methodological rigor, conceptual significance, and alignment with the journal’s scope. Possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with minor revisions, invitation for major revisions, or outright rejection. The Chief Editor’s decision is final and is made with utmost consideration for the integrity of the peer review process and the journal’s standards.

Reviewers’ Responsibilities

Reviewers are essential contributors to maintaining the quality and integrity of the journal. They are expected to provide constructive, impartial, and timely feedback to the authors and the editorial team. Reviewers must maintain confidentiality regarding the manuscripts they assess and disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may influence their impartiality.

Confidentiality and Anonymity

We uphold strict confidentiality regarding the identities of both authors and reviewers throughout the peer review process. Reviewers’ identities are not disclosed to the authors, and vice versa, to ensure unbiased evaluations. We strongly discourage attempts to ascertain reviewer identities or confront reviewers directly, as such actions may compromise the integrity of the peer review process.

Timeliness and Integrity

We are committed to ensuring timely editorial decisions and request reviewers to respond promptly to invitations and provide feedback within agreed timelines. Reviewers are encouraged to maintain the highest standards of integrity and objectivity in their assessments, fostering a culture of academic excellence and collaboration.

Conflict of Interest

Reviewers are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may influence their ability to provide an impartial evaluation. If a reviewer perceives a significant conflict of interest, they are encouraged to seek clarification from the editorial team or decline the invitation to review.

Final Decision and Publication

The Editor-In-Chief is responsible for the final decision on manuscript acceptance or rejection, based on the peer reviewers’ feedback and editorial assessment. Accepted manuscripts are published promptly, typically within 15 days of acceptance, to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly knowledge.

Conclusion

International Journal of Ayurveda360 (IJOA) is dedicated to upholding the highest standards of peer review excellence and integrity. Our Peer Review Policy is instrumental in maintaining the quality, credibility, and impact of the journal within the scientific community. We are grateful to our reviewers for their invaluable contributions and commitment to advancing scholarly discourse in Ayurveda and integrated medical sciences.