The International Journal of Ayurveda360 is a reputable scientific journal dedicated to advancing Ayurveda and integrated medical sciences. We adhere to the highest standards of peer review integrity, ensuring the fair, unbiased, and timely evaluation of submitted manuscripts. Our Peer Review Policy aligns with the principles outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the Best Practice Guidelines.

Peer Review Timeline

To ensure an efficient and transparent peer-review process, the following timeline is strictly adhered to:

I. Intimation of Manuscript Receival & Sent to 2 Reviewers: 24-28 hours

• Manuscripts are screened for basic compliance and promptly forwarded to two expert reviewers.

II. First Review Report: 7-12 days

• Reviewers assess the manuscript for novelty, methodological rigor, and relevance, providing constructive feedback.

III. Revise & Resubmit: 7-12 days

• Authors address reviewers’ comments and resubmit the revised manuscript.

IV. Second Review Report: 7-12 days

• Revised manuscripts undergo another round of evaluation to verify if suggested improvements were implemented.

V. Resubmit with Minor/Major Revisions (if required): 7-12 days

• For additional changes, authors submit the manuscript for final review.

VI. Acceptance Based on Reviewers’ Report by Editor-in-Chief & Draft Publication: 3-4 days

• The Editor-in-Chief finalizes acceptance based on reviewers’ recommendations, and the draft is prepared for publication.

VII. Proofreading & Publishing in the Next Edition: 8-10 days

• Manuscripts are proofread, formatted, and published in the upcoming edition.

Editorial Review

All manuscripts undergo rigorous editorial review upon submission:

• Manuscripts are initially assessed for alignment with the journal’s scope and quality standards.
• Submissions that meet editorial criteria proceed to double-blind peer review for a more thorough evaluation.
• In exceptional cases, members of the Editorial Board (e.g., Associate Editors, Senior Editors) may act as reviewers to provide specialized insights or expedite the review process.

Peer Review Process

The journal employs a double-blind peer review process:

• Confidentiality: Reviewer and author identities are concealed throughout the review process.
• Reviewer Assignment: Each manuscript is typically assigned to 2–3 expert reviewers, with additional reviewers consulted for technical or specialized expertise.
• Objective Evaluation: Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on criteria such as:
  • Novelty of research
  • Methodological soundness
  • Conceptual significance
  • Alignment with the journal’s scope
• Final Decision: The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision, guided by reviewers’ feedback and editorial considerations.

Reviewers’ Responsibilities

Reviewers play a pivotal role in maintaining the journal’s quality and credibility. They are expected to:

• Provide constructive and unbiased feedback within agreed timelines.
• Maintain strict confidentiality about the manuscripts they assess.
• Disclose any conflicts of interest that may influence their impartiality.
• Uphold the highest standards of integrity and objectivity in their evaluations.

Conflict of Interest

To ensure integrity, reviewers are required to:

• Disclose any potential conflicts of interest before accepting an invitation to review.
• Recuse themselves from reviewing manuscripts if conflicts significantly impair impartiality.

Confidentiality and Anonymity

The journal upholds strict confidentiality:

• Reviewers’ identities remain undisclosed to authors and vice versa.
• Authors are discouraged from attempting to identify or contact reviewers, as this may compromise the process’s integrity.

Acknowledgment of Reviewers

We recognize the invaluable contributions of our reviewers:

• Their names may be listed in an annual acknowledgment (with their consent).
• Certificates or letters of appreciation may be issued to acknowledge their efforts.

Editorial Independence

The editorial process operates independently to ensure that:

• All decisions are based solely on academic merit and ethical considerations.
• Editorial board members, including Associate Editors or Senior Editors, may act as reviewers when necessary, ensuring rigorous and impartial evaluations.

Thus,

The International Journal of Ayurveda360 is committed to upholding the highest standards of peer review excellence. Our comprehensive Peer Review Policy ensures a transparent, efficient, and fair evaluation of manuscripts, fostering trust and credibility within the academic community.

This policy, coupled with the outlined timeline, ensures the timely and ethical dissemination of quality research in the fields of Ayurveda and integrated medical sciences.