The Male Pelvis In Sagittal View: A Comprehensive Anatomical Insight Across Modalities
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: The male pelvis is a critical anatomical region involved in multiple physiological systems, including urinary, reproductive, and gastrointestinal functions. A thorough understanding of its sagittal anatomy is fundamental for clinicians, radiologists, and educators in various medical disciplines.
Methods: This study provides an in-depth examination of the sagittal section of the male pelvis through four distinct visualization modalities: traditional anatomical diagrams, CT imaging, the Anatomage virtual dissection table, and cadaveric dissection. Each modality was assessed for its contributions to anatomical understanding, with a focus on clarity, precision, and clinical relevance.
Results: The comparative analysis of these visualization techniques highlights their respective strengths and limitations. Traditional anatomical diagrams offer foundational clarity, while CT imaging and virtual dissection enhance spatial understanding and interactivity. Although cadaveric dissection provides realistic anatomical details, it is limited by accessibility and practical constraints.
Discussion: Clinical applications of sagittal pelvic imaging include enhanced diagnostic capabilities for conditions such as benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostate cancer, rectal tumors, and pelvic trauma. The integration of traditional and advanced visualization methods fosters a multidimensional approach to anatomical learning, improving both clinical practice and educational outcomes.
Conclusion: The combination of multiple visualization modalities significantly enriches the understanding of male pelvic anatomy, providing a robust tool for clinical practice and educational development. These approaches contribute to more effective training, diagnosis, and treatment planning in medical fields.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the International Journal of Ayurveda360 a non-exclusive license to publish, distribute, and reproduce the work in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The CC BY 4.0 license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, including commercial use, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.
How to Cite
References
1. Roscher P. Male pelvic anatomy. Men’s Health Plus. 2022 Feb.
2. Vrtovec T, Janssen MMA, Likar B, Castelein RM, Viergever MA, Pernuš F. Evaluation of pelvic morphology in the sagittal plane. Spine J. 2013;13(11):1500-9. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.034.
3. Sienkiewicz-Zawilińska J, Zawiliński J, Urbaniak-Bereza T, Kowalski W, Loukas M, Walocha J. Autonomic nervous system of the pelvis—general overview. Folia Med Cracov. 2018;58(2):21–44. doi:10.24425/fmc.2018.124656.
4. Standring S, editor. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 41st ed. London: Elsevier; 2016.
5. Snell RS. Clinical Anatomy by Regions. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
6. Marieb EN, Hoehn K. Human Anatomy & Physiology. 10th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2016.
7. Netter FH. Atlas of Human Anatomy. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018.
8. Young B, O’Dowd G, Woodford P. Wheater’s Functional Histology. 6th ed. London: Elsevier; 2014.
9. Nowakowski M, Kolber W, Bachul P, Sienkiewicz-Zawilińska J, Gryglewski A, Goncerz G. Nerve supply of pelvic viscera—anatomical notes, clinical implication on nerve stimulation. Folia Med Cracov. 2013;53(3):33–6.
10. e-Anatomy. [Internet]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37019/e-anatomy/181
11. O’Connell AM, et al. CT of pelvic extraperitoneal spaces: an anatomical study in cadavers. Clin Radiol. 2007;62(5):432–8.
12. Meyers MA, Whalen JP, Peelle K. Radiologic features of extraperitoneal effusions: an anatomic approach. Radiology. 1972;104:249–57.
13. Meyers MA. Radiological features of the spread and localization of extraperitoneal gas and their relationship to its source. Radiology. 1974;111:17–26.
14. Parker RM, Robison JR. Anatomy and diagnosis of torsion of the testicle. J Urol. 1971;106(2):243–7. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)61267-9.
15. Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy JP. Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(17):1828–33. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a13c08.
16. Brown J, et al. Medical student perceptions of the Anatomage Table for anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(5):500–9.
17. Paech D, et al. Bridging the gap: Radiologic anatomy in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2021;55(6):676–87.
18. Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Ann Anat. 2016;208:151–7.